Italian Job (remake)
Written 12 April 2005
Warning: This film review
reveals most of the plot of the movie.
| Overall rating |
A |
| Script |
A |
| Acting |
A |
| Effects |
B |
| Plot |
A |
I've gotten in the habit of going to the
local movie theater a few times a month, usually
on a Saturday or Sunday morning. It allows me to
catch a movie at the matinee prices without a
lot of people crowded around me. I virtually
always visit the theater alone, as I want to
have my attention on the movie, not on another
person or group of people. I've never understood
the concept of going to the movies as a social
event - you cannot talk, play games or enjoy
each other's company. I save that for things
more suitable for two or more people to
socialize, such as hiking, going to dinner and
so on.
Thus, as is my usual custom, I went to see
the Italian Job alone. I had no idea what to
expect from this movie. I hadn't seen any
trailers nor had I gotten any opinions from
anyone. In fact, I picked it out of the movie
lineup on the movie website and simple went
because nothing else grabbed my attention.
The movie was worth the trip. In fact, over
the next two months, I actually visited the
theater twice more (for a total of three times)
to see this movie again, and I watched it on
video on at least half a dozen more occasions
(the most recent being last night). This is a
very well done movie. Not academy award material
(which is really a complement considering some
of the junk that gets nominated and wins), but
very entertaining, fast paced, and fun.
The movie stars one of my favorite actors:
Donald Sutherland, and one of my least favorite
actors (up to this point anyway), Marck Wahlburg.
Now I am a little biased against Wahlburg as he
was the star of the Planet of the Apes Remake,
which was pure junk. In that film, his acting
was wooden and uninpired, but perhaps, in
hindsight, he was tied down by lame directing
and a poor script.
Steve Norton does a fine job as the bad guy,
very believable. In fact, the whole movie is
completely believable, even when impossible
things are happening, I completely bought it
all. Why? Because the plot is tight, the
characters are well developed, the acting is
great, and the focus is on the story, not on
something else.
The movie opens with a number of interesting
characters pulling off a heist. It's complex but
believable, the idea being to blow a hole in the
floor under a safe full of gold bars. They pull
it off with a standard boat chase scene in
Vienna, Italy, which turns out to be a
diversion. The safe really is underwater, and
they remove the bars at their leisure as the
unknowing guards and policemen run around in the
building above.
Steve, played by Steve Norton, turns on the
crew, killing John (Donald Sutherland) and
making off with the gold. He is tracked down to
Los Angeles, and the crew reunites, along with
John's daughter, to get revenge by relieving
Steve of the gold.
I liked the addition of the mini-coopers, a
very small car, and the scenes in the Los
Angeles metro subway system. I often ride that
subway and it was interesting to see the same
places that I've traveled in the movie.
The ending was very well done, especially as
Steve gets what's coming to him. You see, he
killed the wrong person, which unites the
thieves with a character called "Moskov" or
something to that effect. He's also known as the
Ukrainian, and the mere mention of his name is
enough to send shivers of fear down the spine of
Skinny Pete. When you see Skinny Pete, you will
understand how tough Moskov must be.
I loved the music, very classy and well done.
Usually I've found that movie music is either
too glaring or too subtle, but Italian Job got
it perfect. The sound track set the feel to
"classy" in my mind.
But the thing that makes this movie stand out
in my mind is what it didn't do. The director
could easily have turned it into just another
shoot-em-up action film with explosions and
death all over the place. He didn't do that,
instead concentrating on the plot and leaving
most of the violence, except where absolutely
necessary, in the background or implied.
And finally, even though the movie has a
major "babe", Charlize Theron, she stays
believable and in character the entire time. In
other words, she didn't jump into the sack with
anyone, she didn't have romantic interludes and
she remained focused on her mission: revenge.
She didn't even do the almost obligatory
gratuitous topless shot which seems so common in
lesser movies these days. Because of that, the
director and the actress earned my respect, and
that's tough to do. |